| Peer-Reviewed

Substantiation Stages of Rehabilitation at the Patients with Metaepiphyseal Osteomyelitis

Received: 3 May 2017     Accepted: 22 May 2017     Published: 18 October 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Surgeons and orthopedists, which carried out medical and rehabilitative measures at the patients with metaepiphyseal osteomyelitis did not pay attention to the socio-psychological rehabilitation. Purpose of research is determination volume of methods for rehabilitation this group of patients. In our study we carried out sociological survey, using own questionnaire. On the basic question of the questionnaire – does the disease influence to the realization of vital important plans in a patient’s life, 8 (15.1%) respondents had been answered, that osteomyelitis destroyed all plans in their life. The given conclusion was shown primary among male - patients – 18.2%, than among female – only 10% (p >0.05). Volume of rehabilitation we combined with issues of abilitation – the system of therapeutic measures, which should prevent and eliminate pathological conditions at the children with metaepiphyseal osteomyelitis.

Published in American Journal of Pediatrics (Volume 3, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajp.20170305.14
Page(s) 46-50
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Сhildren, Metaepiphyseal Osteomyelitis, Medical Rehabilitation, Abilitation

References
[1] Lowden C. M., Walsh S. J. Acute staphylococcal osteomyelitis of the clavicle. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1997; 17 (4): 467–469.
[2] McGraw M. A., Mehlman C. T., Lindsell C. J., Kirby C. L. Postnatal growth of the clavicle: birth to 18 years of age. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2009; 29 (8): 937–943.
[3] Moseley H. F. The clavicle: its anatomy and function. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1968; 58: 17–27.
[4] Ogden J. A., Conlogue G. J., Bronson M. L. Radiology of postnatal skeletal development. III. The clavicle.Skeletal Radiology. 1979; 4 (4): 196–203.
[5] Gerscovich E. O., Greenspan A. Osteomyelitis of the clavicle: clinical, radiologic, and bacteriologic findings in ten patients. Skeletal Radiology. 1994; 23 (3): 205–210.
[6] Franklin J. L., Parker J. C., King H. A. Nontraumatic clavicle lesions in children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1987; 7 (5): 575–578.
[7] Morrey B. F., Bianco A. J., Jr. Hematogenous osteomyelitis of the clavicle in children. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1977; (125): 24–28.
[8] Srivastava K. K., Garg L. D., Kochhar V. L. Osteomyelitis of the clavicle. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1974; 45 (5): 662–667.
[9] Kocher M. S., Lee B., Dolan M., Weinberg J., Shulman S. T. Pediatric orthopedic infections: early detection and treatment. Pediatric Annals. 2006; 35 (2): 112–122.
[10] Pineda C., Vargas A., Rodríguez A. V. Imaging of osteomyelitis: current concepts. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 2006; 20(4): 789–825.
[11] Schuppen J., van Doorn M. M. A. C., van Rijn R. R. Childhood osteomyelitis: imaging characteristics.Insights into Imaging. 2012; 3 (5): 519–533.
[12] Robben S. G. Ultrasonography of musculoskeletal infections in children. European Radiology, Supplement. 2004; 14 (4): 65–77.
[13] Lew P. D. P., Waldvogel P. F. A. Osteomyelitis. Lancet. 2004; 364 (9431): 369–379.
[14] Peltola H., Pääkkönen M. Acute osteomyelitis in children. New England Journal of Medicine.2014; 370 (4): 352–360.
[15] Donovan R. M., Shah K. J. Unusual sites of acute osteomyelitis in childhood. Clinical Radiology.1982; 33 (2): 222–230.
[16] Darouiche RO. Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N Eng J Med. 2004; 350: 1422–9.
[17] Trampuz A, Widmer AF. Infections associated with orthopedic implants. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2006; 19: 349–56.
[18] Parvizi J, Adeli B, Zimistowski B, Restepo C, Greenwald AS. Management of periprosthetic joint infection: current knowledge: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg. 2012; 94:104.
[19] Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Oschner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1645–54.
[20] Worlock P, Slack R, Harvey L, Mawhinney R. The prevention of infection in open fractures: an experimental study of the effect of fracture stability. Injury. 1994; 25 (1): 31–38.
[21] Perren SM. Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; 138: 175–96.
[22] Wehrli W. Rifampin: mechanisms of action and resistance. Rev Infect Dis. 1983; 5(Suppl 3): S407–11.
[23] Stojicic S, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Effect of the source of biofilm bacteria, level of biofilm, maturation, and type of disinfecting agent on the susceptibility of biofilm bacteria to antibacterial agents. J Endo. 2013; 39 (4): 473–7.
[24] Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 56(1): e1–25.
[25] Kiedrowski MR, Horswill AR. New approaches for treating staphylococcal biofilm infections. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011; 1241: 104–21.
[26] Wang X, Wang Z, Fu J. Induced membrane technique for the treatment of chronic hematogenous tibia osteomyelitis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jan 23; 18(1): 33.
[27] Chrysochoou EA, Antachopoulos C, Badekas K, Roilides E. A Rare Case of Clavicle Osteomyelitis in a Child and Literature Review. Case Rep Pediatr. 2016; 2016: 82(52): 38.
[28] Morita M, Iwasaki R, Sato Y. et al. Elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokine levels following anti-resorptive drug treatment is required for osteonecrosis development in infectious osteomyelitis. Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 7; 7: 46322.
[29] Wagner JM, Jaurich H, Wallner C, et al. Diminished bone regeneration after debridement of posttraumatic osteomyelitis is accompanied by altered cytokine levels, elevated B cell activity, and increased osteoclast activity. J Orthop Res. 2017 Mar 6. doi: 10.1002/jor.23555.
[30] Tuck M, Lim J. et al. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma masquerading as osteomyelitis of the shoulder: an uncommon presentation. BMJ Case Rep. 2016 Dec 21; 2016. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2016-217317.
[31] De Mulder P, Harth C, Ide L, Vallaeys J, Baelde N, De Bo T. An uncommon cause of sciatic pain: tuberculous osteomyelitis of the ischial tuberosity. Acta Clin Belg. 2017 Jan 11:1-4. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2016.1271499.
[32] Funk SS, Copley LA. Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis in Children: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Orthop Clin North Am. 2017 Apr;48(2):199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2016.12.007.
[33] Dunphy L, Iyer S, Brown C. Rare cause of back pain: Staphylococcus aureus vertebral osteomyelitis complicated by recurrent epidural abscess and severe sepsis. BMJ Case Rep. 2016 Dec 13;2016. pii: bcr2016217111. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2016-217111.
[34] Hellebrekers P, Leenen LP, Hoekstra M, Hietbrink F. Effect of a standardized treatment regime for infection after osteosynthesis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Mar 9;12(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0535-x.
[35] Hudson JW, Daly AP, Foster M. Treatment of Osteomyelitis: A Case for Disruption of the Affected Adjacent Periosteum. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Mar 18. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.03.008.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Lukianenko Dmytro Mykolaiovych. (2017). Substantiation Stages of Rehabilitation at the Patients with Metaepiphyseal Osteomyelitis. American Journal of Pediatrics, 3(5), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20170305.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Lukianenko Dmytro Mykolaiovych. Substantiation Stages of Rehabilitation at the Patients with Metaepiphyseal Osteomyelitis. Am. J. Pediatr. 2017, 3(5), 46-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ajp.20170305.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Lukianenko Dmytro Mykolaiovych. Substantiation Stages of Rehabilitation at the Patients with Metaepiphyseal Osteomyelitis. Am J Pediatr. 2017;3(5):46-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ajp.20170305.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajp.20170305.14,
      author = {Lukianenko Dmytro Mykolaiovych},
      title = {Substantiation Stages of Rehabilitation at the Patients with Metaepiphyseal Osteomyelitis},
      journal = {American Journal of Pediatrics},
      volume = {3},
      number = {5},
      pages = {46-50},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajp.20170305.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20170305.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajp.20170305.14},
      abstract = {Surgeons and orthopedists, which carried out medical and rehabilitative measures at the patients with metaepiphyseal osteomyelitis did not pay attention to the socio-psychological rehabilitation. Purpose of research is determination volume of methods for rehabilitation this group of patients. In our study we carried out sociological survey, using own questionnaire. On the basic question of the questionnaire – does the disease influence to the realization of vital important plans in a patient’s life, 8 (15.1%) respondents had been answered, that osteomyelitis destroyed all plans in their life. The given conclusion was shown primary among male - patients – 18.2%, than among female – only 10% (p >0.05). Volume of rehabilitation we combined with issues of abilitation – the system of therapeutic measures, which should prevent and eliminate pathological conditions at the children with metaepiphyseal osteomyelitis.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Substantiation Stages of Rehabilitation at the Patients with Metaepiphyseal Osteomyelitis
    AU  - Lukianenko Dmytro Mykolaiovych
    Y1  - 2017/10/18
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20170305.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajp.20170305.14
    T2  - American Journal of Pediatrics
    JF  - American Journal of Pediatrics
    JO  - American Journal of Pediatrics
    SP  - 46
    EP  - 50
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-0909
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20170305.14
    AB  - Surgeons and orthopedists, which carried out medical and rehabilitative measures at the patients with metaepiphyseal osteomyelitis did not pay attention to the socio-psychological rehabilitation. Purpose of research is determination volume of methods for rehabilitation this group of patients. In our study we carried out sociological survey, using own questionnaire. On the basic question of the questionnaire – does the disease influence to the realization of vital important plans in a patient’s life, 8 (15.1%) respondents had been answered, that osteomyelitis destroyed all plans in their life. The given conclusion was shown primary among male - patients – 18.2%, than among female – only 10% (p >0.05). Volume of rehabilitation we combined with issues of abilitation – the system of therapeutic measures, which should prevent and eliminate pathological conditions at the children with metaepiphyseal osteomyelitis.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Dnipro, Ukraine

  • Sections